WIREDGOV

Over half (57 per cent) of GPs and other practice-based professionals surveyed by The King’s Fund said that providing continuity of care should be the main priority for improving the quality of general practice in England.

The King’s Fund commissioned the survey earlier this year among GPs and practice-based professionals to provide a snapshot of views from the front line to complement its Inquiry into the Quality of General Practice in England. The survey sought to gain the opinions of GPs and practice-based professionals on the extent to which general practice is currently providing high-quality patient care.

In contrast, just one in five (20 per cent) thought that access to care should be prioritised, despite its strong focus in recent debate on health reform – particularly out-of-hours access, electronic booking and appointment waiting times. The findings are consistent with recent research for the Fund that showed patients would generally opt for better continuity of care over speed of access when given a choice. Many GPs said that quality gains could be made by spending more time with patients and through better co-ordination of care.

Managing long-term conditions was identified as the second place by 40 per cent of respondents, with health prevention a priority for 28 per cent and end-of-life care for 25 per cent.

We also asked about the impact of different methods for quality improvement and which approaches GPs believed are most and least likely to improve quality:

However, it is not clear whether GPs’ views about the impact of patient surveys suggested they do not value the views of patients, or whether their opinions simply reflected concerns about the way that surveys are carried out or how data is presented.

Nick Goodwin, senior fellow at The King’s Fund and director of the GP Inquiry, said:

‘While access to GP services is clearly important and has been the focus of recent NHS reforms, GPs and patients alike are telling us that continuity of care should be a significant aspect in delivering quality improvements in general practice. 

‘The findings also raise some important questions about how best to drive quality improvement. Are pay-for-performance measures really a more important tool for quality improvement than other quality improvement initiatives such as patient feedback or practice accreditation? Does this suggest that GPs are less willing to embrace greater transparency to the public and their peers in the quality of care they provide?’

Findings from The King’s Fund’s Inquiry into the Quality of General Practice in England, undertaken by an independent panel, will be published in the New Year.

Notes to editors

Contact the press team

M:  07584 146035

E:   mediaoffice@kingsfund.org.uk